A train of thought I’ve been riding:
I think being an artist means being able to see what others can’t, interpret it, and express the interpretation with purpose that engages a viewer/listener/experiencer and causes them to change and/or question and examine their own way of seeing/thinking/believing (and/or to show them something they’ve never seen).
My definition leads me to this belief; artists are undeniably important and, once deciding to pursue what I’ve described above, they carry huge responsibility – both for the actions they take and those they don’t take. Influence is very easy. Manipulation is not far from it. In truth, all people have similar responsibility, but since an artist chooses to put his or her work on display – to attract the public eye – she must stand behind it. She must measure it against her beliefs of herself, society, the world, and find it worthy. An artist has a voice that shouts and struggles to be heard, but it is heard.
It is about opening minds – to whatever the artist chooses. In the choice lies the responsibility.
An example: Aesthetically pleasing, decorative art is not worthless and it is art, but there are limits. In my opinion, a pleasing pattern or image put on a journal cover that causes a young girl to buy the journal and want to write in it is worth a very lot. Cover art on books is actually very important. Despite the cliche, everyone judges a book by its cover before they’ve read it. Getting people to read the book is the visual artist’s responsibility (which books does the artist stand by? Which would mar his/her integrity) and what’s in the book is the word artist’s responsibility.
Pop artists (especially music and film) have the weightiest responsibility of all, and the least amount of control.
..these thoughts aren’t quite resolved or finished, but I may add more later, and at least I’ve updated the blog.
-Juliet















